Volume 1 · The Machine Between the Ears · Essay 106
Effective Blaming
Something breaks at work. The first question asked is usually "whose fault?" — and it is the wrong question, asked for understandable reasons.
Blame is satisfying because it closes the case. A culprit is a full stop: the story ends, the anxiety settles, everyone returns to work. But the system that produced the error is untouched, and it produces errors for a living. Punish the nurse and the confusing label stays on the shelf for the next nurse.
The alternative is not softness; it is better engineering. Ask instead: what in the setup made this mistake easy? The tired shift, the ambiguous form, the step no one owned? Fix that, and you have prevented the hundred future errors that blame would have left intact.
Keep blame for malice — it exists and deserves naming. But for the ordinary human slip, the effective question is never "who?" It is "what made this so easy to do wrong?" One question punishes the past. The other protects the future.